ShariaSlideShare

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Texasdisparateimpactamicus1371 Judicial Watch reMagnerUSSC10-1032

Texas disparate impact amicus 1371 - Judicial Watch

                   QUESTIONS  HAS JUSTICE DAVID LILLEHAUG WON MN ELECTION BASED ON CASE FIXING  RE  found at Sharon Anderson 


www.sharon4anderson.blogspot.com http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Lawmen ›
Becraft on Land Patents
1 post by 1 author
 
 
Bob Hurt 
2:21 AM (11 hours ago)
Other recipients: hurtf...@yahoogroups.com



When Uncle Sam got lots of land from some of the original 13 colonies, as well as when he acquired more thru the Louisiana and Gadsden Purchases, and from Mexico and Russia, he eventually sold large parts of those lands. The name of the deed used to transfer title to the first purchaser was “land patent.” Once this land was transferred to the first owner and was no longer owned by the feds, it was subject to the law of the State wherein it was located. The States are constitutionally prevented from “impairing the obligation of contracts”. See Art. 1, section 10, cl. 1. Consequently, the States cannot enact some law impairing the contractual rights possessed by parties having an interest in real property, such as a mortgagee.

Back in the early ‘80s, Carol Landi started an argument about land patents. She used old, no longer effective federal laws to build an argument that a party facing foreclosure could get a copy of the original land patent for his land, “update” it by transferring the patent to himself, and by this simple process of “bringing the land patent up into your own name,” defeat all mortgages, including those given by the property owner. This is a wild, baseless legal argument.

Landi used this argument against her own landlord by “patenting” the landlord’s property in her own name and then suing them for ejectment; she lost. She also tried to patent large tracts of land in her attempt to become the largest landowner in California, but she was eventually prosecuted, convicted for slandering title and spent 9 years in jail. Her whole argument conflicts with the whole body of all state law regarding title to real property.

At the behest of some farmer clients facing foreclosure, I went with them to San Fran in 1984 to meet with Landi. I was impressed with the fact that she was a wild, loose cannon. Thereafter, she promoted her land patent argument all over the country. Those who have tried her process got nowhere, and the following is what I have posted on my website regarding her land patent argument:

  VII. Land Patents:

    Back in 1983 and 1984, Carol Landi popularized an argument that the land patent was the highest and best form of title and that by updating the patent in your own name, you could defeat any mortgages. This contention violated many principles of real property law and when Carol started trying to get patents for most of the land in California brought up into her own name, she went to jail. Others who have raised this crazy argument lost the issue.

1. Landi v. Phelps, 740 F.2d 710 (9th Cir. 1984)
2. Sui v. Landi, 209 Cal.Rptr. 449 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. 1985)
3. Hilgeford v. People's Bank, 607 F.Supp. 536 (N.D.Ind. 1985), affirmed,  776 F.2d 176 (7th Cir.1985).
4. Nixon v. Individual Head of St. Joseph Mtg. Co., 612 F.Supp. 253 (N.D. Ind. 1985)
5. Nixon v. Phillipoff, 615 F.Supp. 890 (N.D. Ind. 1985)
6. Wisconsin v. Glick, 782 F.2d 670 (7th Cir. 1986)
7. Britt v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n. of St. Louis, 505 N.E.2d 387 (Ill. App. 1987)
8. Charles F. Curry Co. v. Goodman, 737 P.2d 963 (Okl.App. 1987)
9. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. Redwine, 755 P.2d 822 (Wash.App. 1988).


Larry







We'll never give up now. We have city employees that are
willing to testify that the city knew damn well they were breaking the law with
what they were and still are doing with landlords.

Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:13 AM
Subject: Check out The Docket - Judicial Watch








 never give up or give in altho the System is so
corrupt.
Have a great Thanksgiving also
Hopefully you must write a Book,Journal vs City
St. Paul

Texas disparate impact amicus 1371

Page 1: Texas disparate impact amicus 1371
Category:Legal Document

Number of Pages:18

Date Created:November 21, 2014

Date Uploaded to the Library:November 24, 2014

Tags:1371Supreme Courttexas Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.

Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
13-13715th Cir.Jan 21, 2015TBDTBDTBDOT 2014
Issue: Whether disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
May 13 2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 16, 2014)
Jun 2 2014Brief of respondent Frazier Revitalization Inc. in support filed.
Jun 4 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Jun 6 2014Consent to the filing of amicus suriae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the respondent Frazier Revitalization Inc.
Jun 11 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Jun 12 2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 16, 2014.
Jun 16 2014Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al. filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amicus curiae of Texas Apartment Association filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amicus curiae of National Multifamily Housing Council filed.
Jun 24 2014Letter proposing a lodging of non-record material, consisting of ACS census data, received from counsel for amicus Eagle Forum filed.
Jul 16 2014Brief of respondent The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. in opposition filed.
Jul 29 2014Reply of petitioners Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al. filed.
Jul 30 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
Oct 2 2014Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Nov 12 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Nov 12 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent Frazier Revitalization, Inc.
Nov 13 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Nov 17 2014Brief amicus curiae of James P. Scanlan filed.
Nov 17 2014Brief of respondent Frazier Revitalization Inc. in support of petitioners filed.
Nov 17 2014Brief of petitioners Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al. filed.
Nov 17 2014Joint appendix filed. Case Update: Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Proceedings and Orders
View Case

Nov 20 2014Brief amici curiae of Gail Heriot, and Peter Kirsanow filed.
Nov 21 2014SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Nov 21 2014Brief amicus curiae of The Project on Fair Representation filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association
Nov 24 2014Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Home Builders filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of American Insurance Association, et al. filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association, et. al., filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc., and (Allied Educational Foundation) filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amicus curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al.
     

Monday, October 14, 2013


USSC10-1032 Magner_Disparate_Mt.Holly ColemansComplicity




Mon 14Oct.2013 VOTE SHARON4ST.PAULMAYOR Tues.5Nov.2013


with update www.judicialwatch.org

Magner v. Gallagher

Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
10-10328th Cir.Not ArguedFeb 14, 2012N/AN/AOT 2011
Share: 
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
JudgmentDismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners
Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party
Merits Briefs for the Respondents
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents


Certiorari-stage documents

Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc.

Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
11-15073d Cir.Dec 4, 2013TBDTBDTBDOT 2013
Share: 
Issue: Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Jun 11 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2012)
Jul 5 2012Waiver of right of respondent Triad Associates, Inc. to respond filed.
Jul 9 2012Waiver of right of respondent Keating Urban Partners, L.L.C. to respond filed.
Jul 10 2012Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 11, 2012.
Jul 12 2012Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2012Brief amici curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2012Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. filed.
Jul 13 2012Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Sep 11 2012Brief of respondents Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
Sep 25 2012Reply of petitioners Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Sep 26 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 12, 2012.
Oct 15 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 26, 2012.
Oct 29 2012The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
May 17 2013Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
May 24 2013Reply of petitioner to brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.
May 28 2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.
Jun 17 2013Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Jul 3 2013The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 26, 2013.
Jul 3 2013The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including October 21, 2013.
Jul 28 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Aug 8 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Keating Urban Partners LLC.
Aug 26 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Triad Associates, Inc.
Aug 26 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al.
Aug 26 2013Brief of respondent Triad Associates, Inc., in support of petitioners filed.
Aug 26 2013Joint appendix filed.
Aug 26 2013Brief of petitioners Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al., filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice in support of neither party filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of Project on Fair Representation filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of APA Watch filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of American Insurance Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of Gail Heriot, et al. filed.
Sep 17 2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday December 4, 2013.
Sep 17 2013CIRCULATED
Sep 20 2013Record from U.S. Court of Appeals for 3rd Circuit is electronic.
Sep 20 2013Record from U.S.District Court. for District of New Jersey is electronic




Sharon Anderson's Newsreel

Loading...

Abolish Property Taxes 3

SharonSearch

Loading...

TellMyPolitican

TellMyPolitician

Sharons Memorys


SharonsStrictScrunity

SharonsStrictScrunity

Worth Reading Headline Animator

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

Sharons Slideshare

SharonsSodaHead

Bookmark and Share

The Political Animal